Architecture

Challenger Selection Logic for Decentralized Proof of Location

This technical note describes the logic and constraints for selecting challenger nodes in a decentralized proof of location (PoL) system. The selection process ensures that challengers are both active and capable of participating in the verification process.

circle-info

The selection process is currently centralized, carried out by the Challenge Coordinator

Inclusion Criteria

1. Activity Status

  • Challengers must have been active within the last 60 seconds

  • This ensures only currently available nodes are selected for challenges

2. Wallet Requirements

  • All challengers must have an associated wallet address

  • Wallet address is used for:

    • Identity verification

    • Transaction signing

3. IP Address Rules

If Prover with Private IP

  • Only challengers with public IP addresses are eligible

  • This ensures reliable communication paths

  • Prevents potential NAT traversal issues

If Prover with Public IP

  • Both public and private IP challengers are eligible

  • Allows for greater network participation

  • Must still meet other selection criteria

Exclusions

4. Participation Status

  • Paused devices are excluded

    • Prevents selection of maintenance mode devices

    • Allows nodes to opt-out temporarily

  • Currently active challengers are excluded

    • Prevents concurrent challenge participation

    • Ensures resource availability

5. Geographic Constraints

  • Maximum distance: 2000 kilometers from the prover. Determined by the lat, long config

  • Distance calculation:

    • Based on registered coordinates in the initial setup phase

    • Uses great circle distance formula

  • Purpose:

    • Ensures realistic challenge timeframes

    • Reduces network latency impact

    • Maintains challenge credibility

6. Selection Limits

  • Maximum of 128 challengers per challenge

  • Self-selection prevention:

    • Prover cannot be selected as its own challenger

    • Verified via public key comparison

Last updated